Demographics details for Reevesville, SC vs Fort valley, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Reevesville, SC vs Fort valley, GA.

Data Reevesville Fort valley
Population 196 8,838
Median Age 41.1 years 30.6 years
Median Income $57,031 $31,807
Married Families 71.0% 18.0%
Poverty Level 12% 25%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Reevesville vs Fort valley

  • The population in Fort valley is higher at 8,838, compared to 196 in Reevesville.
  • Residents in Reevesville have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
  • Reevesville has a higher median income of $57,031 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Reevesville at 71.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Reevesville.
  • The unemployment rate in Reevesville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.

Demographics

Demographics Reevesville vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Reevesville Fort valley
Black 43 70
White 56 18
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 1 8
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Reevesville vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 43% in Reevesville.
  • Reevesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 18% in Fort valley.
  • Both Reevesville and Fort valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Reevesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort valley at 4%, compared to 0% in Reevesville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Reevesville and Fort valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Reevesville Fort valley
Mental Health Not Good 20.4% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.4% 15.5%
Depression 24.6% 19.5%
Smoking 24.1% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 11.8%
Obesity 42.8% 46.2%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Reevesville vs Fort valley

  • More residents in Reevesville report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 19.2% in Fort valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Reevesville at 24.6% compared to 19.5% in Fort valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Reevesville at 24.1% compared to 22.3% in Fort valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Reevesville at 16.6% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
  • Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 42.8% in Reevesville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Reevesville at 23.0% compared to 16.0% in Fort valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Reevesville Fort valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.0% (267)
High School Diploma 18.9% (37) 13.9% (1,226)
Less than High School 13.8% (27) 17.3% (1,527)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.7% (66) 10.8% (954)

Education Levels Comparison: Reevesville vs Fort valley

  • In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Reevesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Reevesville hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort valley at 17.3%, compared to 13.8% in Reevesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Reevesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.