Demographics details for Red springs, NC vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Red springs, NC vs Claremont, CA.
Data | Red springs | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,118 | 36,001 |
Median Age | 36.2 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $20,917 | $115,091 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Red springs vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 3,118 in Red springs.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 36.2 years in Red springs.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $20,917 in Red springs.
- In Claremont, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 27.0% in Red springs.
- Red springs has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Red springs and Claremont at 5.4%.
Demographics
Demographics Red springs vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Red springs | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Black | 47 | 6 |
White | 24 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
Hispanic | 5 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 16 |
American Indian | 21 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Red springs vs Claremont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Red springs at 47% compared to 6% in Claremont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Claremont at 37% compared to 24% in Red springs.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Red springs.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 5% in Red springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 3% in Red springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Red springs at 21% compared to 0% in Claremont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Red springs | Claremont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 14.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 8.5% |
Depression | 22.8% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 8.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 46.8% | 24.5% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Red springs vs Claremont
- More residents in Red springs report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Red springs at 22.8% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Red springs at 25.3% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Claremont at 16.7% compared to 13.1% in Red springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Red springs at 46.8% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Red springs at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Claremont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Red springs | Claremont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (16) | 1.1% (403) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (570) | 6.7% (2,427) |
Less than High School | 16.3% (508) | 6.2% (2,248) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (316) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Red springs vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Red springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Red springs hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- More residents in Red springs have less than a high school education at 16.3% compared to 6.2% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 10.1% in Red springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.