Demographics details for Rayville, LA vs Mcpherson, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rayville, LA vs Mcpherson, KS.

Data Rayville Mcpherson
Population 3,695 13,865
Median Age 33.0 years 36.2 years
Median Income $45,000 $69,807
Married Families 45.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 12% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.3

Population Comparison: Rayville vs Mcpherson

  • The population in Mcpherson is higher at 13,865, compared to 3,695 in Rayville.
  • The median age in Mcpherson is higher at 36.2 years, compared to 33.0 years in Rayville.
  • Mcpherson has a higher median income of $69,807, compared to $45,000 in Rayville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rayville at 45.0% compared to 43.0% in Mcpherson.
  • Rayville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Mcpherson.
  • The unemployment rate in Rayville is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.3% in Mcpherson.

Demographics

Demographics Rayville vs Mcpherson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rayville Mcpherson
Black 60 2
White 30 87
Asian 5 1
Hispanic 3 6
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rayville vs Mcpherson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rayville at 60% compared to 2% in Mcpherson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mcpherson at 87% compared to 30% in Rayville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Rayville at 5% compared to 1% in Mcpherson.
  • Mcpherson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Rayville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mcpherson at 4%, compared to 2% in Rayville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rayville and Mcpherson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rayville Mcpherson
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.7%
Depression Data is updating% 20.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 17.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rayville vs Mcpherson

  • In Mcpherson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mcpherson at 20.1% versus 0.0% in Rayville.
  • Mcpherson has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mcpherson at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • Mcpherson has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mcpherson at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rayville Mcpherson
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (48)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.8% (1,775)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.8% (804)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.7% (3,010)

Education Levels Comparison: Rayville vs Mcpherson

  • In Mcpherson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • In Mcpherson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.8% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mcpherson at 5.8%, compared to 0.0% in Rayville.
  • In Mcpherson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Rayville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.