Demographics details for Radford, VA vs Fort smith, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Radford, VA vs Fort smith, AR.
| Data | Radford | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,738 | 89,992 |
| Median Age | 23.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $51,039 | $50,799 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Radford vs Fort smith
- The population in Fort smith is higher at 89,992, compared to 16,738 in Radford.
- The median age in Fort smith is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 23.3 years in Radford.
- Radford has a higher median income of $51,039 compared to $50,799 in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 23.0% in Radford.
- Radford has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- The unemployment rate in Radford is higher at 4.6%, compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Radford vs Fort smith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Radford | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 8 |
| White | 82 | 57 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Radford vs Fort smith
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Radford at 9% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- Radford has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 57% in Fort smith.
- In Fort smith, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Radford.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 3% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort smith at 9%, compared to 4% in Radford.
- In Fort smith, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Radford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Radford | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 19.1% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 13.2% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Radford vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.1% in Radford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort smith at 27.8% versus 25.7% in Radford.
- Fort smith has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 19.1% in Radford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Radford at 16.1% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 37.8% in Radford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Radford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Radford | Fort smith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (11) | 2.3% (2,029) |
| High School Diploma | 6.7% (1,121) | 14.8% (13,356) |
| Less than High School | 4.9% (820) | 19.8% (17,822) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (3,278) | 16.4% (14,745) |
Education Levels Comparison: Radford vs Fort smith
- In Fort smith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.1% in Radford.
- In Fort smith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 6.7% in Radford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort smith at 19.8%, compared to 4.9% in Radford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Radford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.