Demographics details for Protection, KS vs Galveston, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Protection, KS vs Galveston, TX.
Data | Protection | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Population | 496 | 53,089 |
Median Age | 45.1 years | 39.4 years |
Median Income | $60,833 | $57,453 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Protection vs Galveston
- The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 496 in Protection.
- Residents in Protection have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 39.4 years in Galveston.
- Protection has a higher median income of $60,833 compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Protection at 42.0% compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
- The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 11% in Protection.
- Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Protection.
Demographics
Demographics Protection vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Protection | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 16 |
White | 94 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Protection vs Galveston
- In Galveston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 0% in Protection.
- Protection has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 37% in Galveston.
- In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Protection.
- Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 5% in Protection.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 1% in Protection.
- In Galveston, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Protection.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Protection | Galveston |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 12.3% |
Depression | 20.5% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 38.5% | 37.4% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Protection vs Galveston
- In Galveston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in Protection.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Galveston at 21.7% versus 20.5% in Protection.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Protection at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Galveston.
- Binge drinking is more common in Protection at 20.2% compared to 16.8% in Galveston.
- Obesity rates are higher in Protection at 38.5% compared to 37.4% in Galveston.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Protection.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Protection | Galveston |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (823) |
High School Diploma | 24.8% (123) | 13.8% (7,336) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (40) | 16.6% (8,791) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (102) | 23.2% (12,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Protection vs Galveston
- In Galveston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Protection.
- A higher percentage of residents in Protection hold a high school diploma at 24.8% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Galveston at 16.6%, compared to 8.1% in Protection.
- In Galveston, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 20.6% in Protection.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.