Demographics details for Protection, KS vs Alamo, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Protection, KS vs Alamo, TN.
| Data | Protection | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 496 | 2,317 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 34.9 years |
| Median Income | $60,833 | $50,135 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Protection vs Alamo
- The population in Alamo is higher at 2,317, compared to 496 in Protection.
- Residents in Protection have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Protection has a higher median income of $60,833 compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- In Alamo, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Protection.
- The poverty level is higher in Alamo at 14%, compared to 11% in Protection.
- Alamo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Protection.
Demographics
Demographics Protection vs Alamo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Protection | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 94 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Protection vs Alamo
- In Alamo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Protection.
- Protection has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- In Alamo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Protection.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Protection.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alamo at 17%, compared to 1% in Protection.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Protection and Alamo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Protection | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 15.7% |
| Depression | 20.5% | 29.6% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.2% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Protection vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 15.8% in Protection.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alamo at 29.6% versus 20.5% in Protection.
- Alamo has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 17.7% in Protection.
- Binge drinking is more common in Protection at 20.2% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.5% in Protection.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alamo at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Protection.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Protection | Alamo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 24.8% (123) | 24.9% (577) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (40) | 26.1% (604) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (102) | 7.9% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Protection vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Protection.
- In Alamo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 24.8% in Protection.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alamo at 26.1%, compared to 8.1% in Protection.
- A higher percentage of residents in Protection hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.