Demographics details for Progreso, TX vs Young harris, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Progreso, TX vs Young harris, GA.
| Data | Progreso | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,952 | 810 |
| Median Age | 28.6 years | 20.4 years |
| Median Income | $38,686 | $27,500 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Progreso vs Young harris
- In Progreso, the population is higher at 4,952, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- Residents in Progreso have a higher median age of 28.6 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Progreso has a higher median income of $38,686 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Progreso at 34.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- Progreso has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- The unemployment rate in Progreso is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Progreso vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Progreso | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 14 |
| White | -35 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 99 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 36 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Progreso vs Young harris
- In Young harris, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 0% in Progreso.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Young harris at 70% compared to -35% in Progreso.
- Both Progreso and Young harris have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Progreso at 99% compared to 11% in Young harris.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Progreso at 36% compared to 3% in Young harris.
- In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Progreso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Progreso | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Progreso vs Young harris
- In Young harris, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.0% in Progreso.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Young harris at 23.4% versus 17.7% in Progreso.
- Young harris has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 12.4% in Progreso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Progreso at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Obesity rates are higher in Progreso at 41.5% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Progreso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Progreso | Young harris |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.6% (275) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (628) | 5.7% (46) |
| Less than High School | 49.1% (2,430) | 4.4% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.1% (254) | 9.3% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Progreso vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of residents in Progreso have no formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Progreso hold a high school diploma at 12.7% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- More residents in Progreso have less than a high school education at 49.1% compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- In Young harris, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 5.1% in Progreso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.