Demographics details for Progreso, TX vs Sumter, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Progreso, TX vs Sumter, SC.
| Data | Progreso | Sumter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,952 | 42,757 |
| Median Age | 28.6 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $38,686 | $48,900 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Progreso vs Sumter
- The population in Sumter is higher at 42,757, compared to 4,952 in Progreso.
- The median age in Sumter is higher at 33.1 years, compared to 28.6 years in Progreso.
- Sumter has a higher median income of $48,900, compared to $38,686 in Progreso.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Progreso and Sumter at 34.0%.
- Progreso has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Sumter.
- Sumter has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.5% in Progreso.
Demographics
Demographics Progreso vs Sumter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Progreso | Sumter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 48 |
| White | -35 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 99 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 36 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Progreso vs Sumter
- In Sumter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 48% compared to 0% in Progreso.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sumter at 36% compared to -35% in Progreso.
- In Sumter, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Progreso.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Progreso at 99% compared to 7% in Sumter.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Progreso at 36% compared to 6% in Sumter.
- In Sumter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Progreso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Progreso | Sumter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Progreso vs Sumter
- In Sumter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Progreso.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sumter at 20.9% versus 17.7% in Progreso.
- Sumter has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 12.4% in Progreso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Progreso at 17.7% compared to 15.2% in Sumter.
- Sumter has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 41.5% in Progreso.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sumter at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Progreso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Progreso | Sumter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.6% (275) | 0.6% (246) |
| High School Diploma | 12.7% (628) | 15.8% (6,741) |
| Less than High School | 49.1% (2,430) | 9.2% (3,936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.1% (254) | 17.5% (7,485) |
Education Levels Comparison: Progreso vs Sumter
- A higher percentage of residents in Progreso have no formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 0.6% in Sumter.
- In Sumter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 12.7% in Progreso.
- More residents in Progreso have less than a high school education at 49.1% compared to 9.2% in Sumter.
- In Sumter, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 5.1% in Progreso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.