Demographics details for Princeton, NJ vs Jackson, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Princeton, NJ vs Jackson, MO.
| Data | Princeton | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,377 | 15,702 |
| Median Age | 28.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $176,695 | $72,500 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Princeton vs Jackson
- In Princeton, the population is higher at 30,377, compared to 15,702 in Jackson.
- The median age in Jackson is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 28.6 years in Princeton.
- Princeton has a higher median income of $176,695 compared to $72,500 in Jackson.
- In Jackson, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Princeton.
- The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 8%, compared to 4% in Princeton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Princeton and Jackson at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Princeton vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Princeton | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 60 | 89 |
| Asian | 19 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Princeton vs Jackson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Princeton at 8% compared to 2% in Jackson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 89% compared to 60% in Princeton.
- The Asian population is larger in Princeton at 19% compared to 1% in Jackson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Princeton at 6% compared to 3% in Jackson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Princeton at 6% compared to 5% in Jackson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Princeton at 1% compared to 0% in Jackson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Princeton | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 8.8% | 17.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 19.4% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Princeton vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.1% in Princeton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 25.5% versus 18.9% in Princeton.
- Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 8.8% in Princeton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jackson at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Princeton.
- Jackson has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 19.4% in Princeton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in Princeton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Princeton | Jackson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (52) | 0.5% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 2.6% (777) | 15.4% (2,423) |
| Less than High School | 1.8% (559) | 7.8% (1,231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.6% (14,457) | 23.8% (3,742) |
Education Levels Comparison: Princeton vs Jackson
- In Jackson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Princeton.
- In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 2.6% in Princeton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 7.8%, compared to 1.8% in Princeton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Princeton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.6% compared to 23.8% in Jackson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.