Demographics details for Princeton, NC vs Bozeman, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Princeton, NC vs Bozeman, MT.
| Data | Princeton | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,418 | 56,123 |
| Median Age | 33.1 years | 28.2 years |
| Median Income | $34,315 | $74,113 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Princeton vs Bozeman
- The population in Bozeman is higher at 56,123, compared to 1,418 in Princeton.
- Residents in Princeton have a higher median age of 33.1 years compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113, compared to $34,315 in Princeton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Princeton at 35.0% compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- Princeton has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Bozeman.
- The unemployment rate in Princeton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Princeton vs Bozeman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Princeton | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 24 | 1 |
| White | 47 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Princeton vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Princeton at 24% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bozeman at 86% compared to 47% in Princeton.
- In Bozeman, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Princeton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Princeton at 24% compared to 5% in Bozeman.
- Both Princeton and Bozeman have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In Bozeman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Princeton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Princeton | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 43.2% | 24.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Princeton vs Bozeman
- More residents in Princeton report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Princeton at 24.9% compared to 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Princeton at 20.2% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 16.3% in Princeton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Princeton at 43.2% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Princeton at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Princeton | Bozeman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 0.0% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 13.4% (190) | 5.7% (3,187) |
| Less than High School | 23.5% (333) | 2.3% (1,316) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (121) | 35.7% (20,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Princeton vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of residents in Princeton have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Princeton hold a high school diploma at 13.4% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- More residents in Princeton have less than a high school education at 23.5% compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 8.5% in Princeton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.