Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Galveston, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Galveston, TX.

Data Powder springs Galveston
Population 17,337 53,089
Median Age 38.7 years 39.4 years
Median Income $88,311 $57,453
Married Families 36.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 16%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.6

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Galveston

  • The population in Galveston is higher at 53,089, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • The median age in Galveston is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 38.7 years in Powder springs.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $57,453 in Galveston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Powder springs at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Galveston.
  • The poverty level is higher in Galveston at 16%, compared to 12% in Powder springs.
  • Galveston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Galveston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Galveston
Black 51 16
White 22 37
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 19 30
Two or More Races 5 13
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Galveston

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 16% in Galveston.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Galveston at 37% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • In Galveston, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Powder springs.
  • Galveston has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Galveston at 13%, compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Powder springs and Galveston at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Galveston
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 16.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 12.3%
Depression 17.7% 21.7%
Smoking 14.4% 16.9%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 16.8%
Obesity 33.0% 37.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Galveston

  • In Galveston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Galveston at 21.7% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Galveston has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Galveston at 16.8% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Galveston has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Galveston at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Galveston
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 1.6% (823)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 13.8% (7,336)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 16.6% (8,791)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 23.2% (12,311)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Galveston

  • In Galveston, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.3% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 13.8% in Galveston.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Galveston at 16.6%, compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 23.2% in Galveston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.