Demographics details for Powder springs, GA vs Cameron, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Powder springs, GA vs Cameron, TX.

Data Powder springs Cameron
Population 17,337 425,208
Median Age 38.7 years 32.0 years
Median Income $88,311 $47,435
Married Families 36.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.2

Population Comparison: Powder springs vs Cameron

  • The population in Cameron is higher at 425,208, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • Residents in Powder springs have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 32.0 years in Cameron.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311 compared to $47,435 in Cameron.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Powder springs and Cameron at 36.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cameron at 15%, compared to 12% in Powder springs.
  • Cameron has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Powder springs vs Cameron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Powder springs Cameron
Black 51 1
White 22 60
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 19 89
Two or More Races 5 29
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Powder springs vs Cameron

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Powder springs at 51% compared to 1% in Cameron.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cameron at 60% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Powder springs at 2% compared to 1% in Cameron.
  • Cameron has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 89%, compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cameron at 29%, compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Powder springs at 1% compared to 0% in Cameron.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Powder springs Cameron
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 17.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 14.6%
Depression 17.7% 19.0%
Smoking 14.4% 15.4%
Binge Drinking 14.4% 16.3%
Obesity 33.0% 44.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Powder springs vs Cameron

  • In Cameron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cameron at 19.0% versus 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Cameron has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cameron at 16.3% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • Cameron has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cameron at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Powder springs Cameron
No Schooling 1.3% (225) 2.8% (11,750)
High School Diploma 15.0% (2,598) 12.6% (53,487)
Less than High School 7.6% (1,309) 34.2% (145,250)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (4,561) 11.5% (48,712)

Education Levels Comparison: Powder springs vs Cameron

  • In Cameron, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.3% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 12.6% in Cameron.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cameron at 34.2%, compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Powder springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 11.5% in Cameron.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.