Demographics details for Poseyville, IN vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Poseyville, IN vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data Poseyville Fort lupton
Population 967 8,829
Median Age 41.3 years 35.9 years
Median Income $65,833 $71,293
Married Families 48.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 7% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Poseyville vs Fort lupton

  • The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 967 in Poseyville.
  • Residents in Poseyville have a higher median age of 41.3 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $65,833 in Poseyville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Poseyville at 48.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 7% in Poseyville.
  • Fort lupton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Poseyville.

Demographics

Demographics Poseyville vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Poseyville Fort lupton
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 97 26
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 53
Two or More Races 3 20
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Poseyville vs Fort lupton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Poseyville and Fort lupton at 0%.
  • Poseyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both Poseyville and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 0% in Poseyville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 3% in Poseyville.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Poseyville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Poseyville Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.0% 11.8%
Depression 25.6% 19.9%
Smoking 18.6% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 17.0%
Obesity 37.8% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Poseyville vs Fort lupton

  • More residents in Poseyville report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Poseyville at 25.6% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Poseyville at 18.6% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Poseyville at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Poseyville at 37.8% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Poseyville at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Poseyville Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.6% (6) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 27.1% (262) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 20.7% (200) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.6% (151) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: Poseyville vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Poseyville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Poseyville hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 20.7% in Poseyville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Poseyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.