Demographics details for Port jefferson, OH vs Plymouth, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port jefferson, OH vs Plymouth, MI.

Data Port jefferson Plymouth
Population 304 9,252
Median Age 46.5 years 44.3 years
Median Income $36,250 $107,156
Married Families 50.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 3.2

Population Comparison: Port jefferson vs Plymouth

  • The population in Plymouth is higher at 9,252, compared to 304 in Port jefferson.
  • Residents in Port jefferson have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 44.3 years in Plymouth.
  • Plymouth has a higher median income of $107,156, compared to $36,250 in Port jefferson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port jefferson at 50.0% compared to 40.0% in Plymouth.
  • Port jefferson has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Plymouth.
  • The unemployment rate in Port jefferson is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.2% in Plymouth.

Demographics

Demographics Port jefferson vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port jefferson Plymouth
Black Data is updating 3
White 97 89
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port jefferson vs Plymouth

  • In Plymouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Port jefferson.
  • Port jefferson has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 89% in Plymouth.
  • In Plymouth, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Port jefferson.
  • Plymouth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Port jefferson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Plymouth at 4%, compared to 2% in Port jefferson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port jefferson and Plymouth at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port jefferson Plymouth
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 7.7%
Depression 23.5% 22.2%
Smoking 18.2% 12.0%
Binge Drinking 20.3% 20.9%
Obesity 38.4% 26.8%
Disability Percentage 34.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port jefferson vs Plymouth

  • More residents in Port jefferson report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.6% in Plymouth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port jefferson at 23.5% compared to 22.2% in Plymouth.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port jefferson at 18.2% compared to 12.0% in Plymouth.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Plymouth at 20.9% compared to 20.3% in Port jefferson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port jefferson at 38.4% compared to 26.8% in Plymouth.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port jefferson at 34.0% compared to 9.0% in Plymouth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port jefferson Plymouth
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.1% (10)
High School Diploma 53.3% (162) 8.5% (783)
Less than High School 18.8% (57) 2.4% (220)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 4.3% (13) 45.4% (4,203)

Education Levels Comparison: Port jefferson vs Plymouth

  • In Plymouth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Port jefferson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port jefferson hold a high school diploma at 53.3% compared to 8.5% in Plymouth.
  • More residents in Port jefferson have less than a high school education at 18.8% compared to 2.4% in Plymouth.
  • In Plymouth, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.4% compared to 4.3% in Port jefferson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.