Demographics details for Port huron, MI vs Spokane, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port huron, MI vs Spokane, WA.
Data | Port huron | Spokane |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,626 | 230,160 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $47,906 | $63,316 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Port huron vs Spokane
- The population in Spokane is higher at 230,160, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
- Residents in Port huron have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 37.0 years in Spokane.
- Spokane has a higher median income of $63,316, compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- In Spokane, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Spokane.
- The unemployment rate in Port huron is higher at 7.0%, compared to 4.2% in Spokane.
Demographics
Demographics Port huron vs Spokane provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port huron | Spokane |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 3 |
White | 76 | 77 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port huron vs Spokane
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port huron at 8% compared to 3% in Spokane.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spokane at 77% compared to 76% in Port huron.
- In Spokane, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Port huron.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Port huron and Spokane at 7%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spokane at 9%, compared to 8% in Port huron.
- In Spokane, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port huron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port huron | Spokane |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Depression | 28.2% | 28.9% |
Smoking | 25.7% | 15.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 30.4% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port huron vs Spokane
- More residents in Port huron report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.8% in Spokane.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane at 28.9% versus 28.2% in Port huron.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port huron at 25.7% compared to 15.9% in Spokane.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spokane at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Port huron.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port huron at 40.5% compared to 30.4% in Spokane.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Spokane.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port huron | Spokane |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (172) | 0.7% (1,705) |
High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,596) | 12.2% (28,084) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (3,870) | 8.4% (19,336) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (3,662) | 22.6% (52,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port huron vs Spokane
- In Spokane, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port huron hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 12.2% in Spokane.
- More residents in Port huron have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 8.4% in Spokane.
- In Spokane, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.6% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.