Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Port gibson | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Provo has a higher median income of $57,943, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Provo, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | 1 |
| White | 12 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 1% in Provo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Provo
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port gibson at 10.2% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.