Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Port gibson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 16% in Central city.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | 3 |
| White | 12 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Central city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Port gibson and Central city at 24.8%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 14.8% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.