Demographics details for Port deposit, MD vs Milford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port deposit, MD vs Milford, CT.
| Data | Port deposit | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 621 | 50,471 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $46,979 | $104,503 |
| Married Families | 24.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Port deposit vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 50,471, compared to 621 in Port deposit.
- The median age in Milford is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 38.1 years in Port deposit.
- Milford has a higher median income of $104,503, compared to $46,979 in Port deposit.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 24.0% in Port deposit.
- Port deposit has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Milford.
- Milford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Port deposit.
Demographics
Demographics Port deposit vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port deposit | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 2 |
| White | 60 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port deposit vs Milford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port deposit at 19% compared to 2% in Milford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 79% compared to 60% in Port deposit.
- In Milford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Port deposit.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port deposit at 10% compared to 8% in Milford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port deposit at 9% compared to 6% in Milford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port deposit and Milford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port deposit | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 20.5% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 27.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port deposit vs Milford
- More residents in Port deposit report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 13.2% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port deposit at 22.2% compared to 20.5% in Milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port deposit at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port deposit at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port deposit at 36.1% compared to 27.5% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port deposit at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port deposit | Milford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (7) | 0.7% (366) |
| High School Diploma | 15.6% (97) | 16.7% (8,431) |
| Less than High School | 7.2% (45) | 6.6% (3,307) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (142) | 36.0% (18,184) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port deposit vs Milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Port deposit have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Milford.
- In Milford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 15.6% in Port deposit.
- More residents in Port deposit have less than a high school education at 7.2% compared to 6.6% in Milford.
- In Milford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 22.9% in Port deposit.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.