Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Sunland park, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Sunland park, NM.
Data | Port clinton | Sunland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,966 | 17,414 |
Median Age | 44.9 years | 33.3 years |
Median Income | $55,534 | $45,545 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Sunland park
- The population in Sunland park is higher at 17,414, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 33.3 years in Sunland park.
- Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534 compared to $45,545 in Sunland park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port clinton at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Sunland park.
- The poverty level is higher in Sunland park at 20%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
- Sunland park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Sunland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port clinton | Sunland park |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 1 |
White | 82 | Data is updating |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 91 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 28 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Sunland park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port clinton at 3% compared to 1% in Sunland park.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 0% in Sunland park.
- Both Port clinton and Sunland park have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Sunland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 91%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sunland park at 28%, compared to 8% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Sunland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port clinton | Sunland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 17.2% |
Depression | 25.1% | 21.2% |
Smoking | 24.0% | 20.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 42.8% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Sunland park
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.4% in Sunland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 21.2% in Sunland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 20.8% in Sunland park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 12.4% in Sunland park.
- Sunland park has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Sunland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port clinton | Sunland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (261) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 11.6% (2,019) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 29.5% (5,138) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 12.2% (2,130) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Sunland park
- In Sunland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 11.6% in Sunland park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sunland park at 29.5%, compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 12.2% in Sunland park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.