Demographics details for Port carbon, PA vs Oglethorpe, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port carbon, PA vs Oglethorpe, GA.

Data Port carbon Oglethorpe
Population 1,807 15,469
Median Age 48.4 years 42.2 years
Median Income $54,706 $66,672
Married Families 43.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 9% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.7

Population Comparison: Port carbon vs Oglethorpe

  • The population in Oglethorpe is higher at 15,469, compared to 1,807 in Port carbon.
  • Residents in Port carbon have a higher median age of 48.4 years compared to 42.2 years in Oglethorpe.
  • Oglethorpe has a higher median income of $66,672, compared to $54,706 in Port carbon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port carbon at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Oglethorpe.
  • The poverty level is higher in Oglethorpe at 15%, compared to 9% in Port carbon.
  • The unemployment rate in Port carbon is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Oglethorpe.

Demographics

Demographics Port carbon vs Oglethorpe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port carbon Oglethorpe
Black 3 16
White 93 73
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 6
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port carbon vs Oglethorpe

  • In Oglethorpe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Port carbon.
  • Port carbon has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 73% in Oglethorpe.
  • In Oglethorpe, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Port carbon.
  • Oglethorpe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 2% in Port carbon.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oglethorpe at 4%, compared to 2% in Port carbon.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port carbon and Oglethorpe at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port carbon Oglethorpe
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 12.4%
Depression 24.5% 22.2%
Smoking 21.2% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 16.9%
Obesity 38.8% 34.1%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port carbon vs Oglethorpe

  • More residents in Port carbon report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Oglethorpe.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port carbon at 24.5% compared to 22.2% in Oglethorpe.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port carbon at 21.2% compared to 18.5% in Oglethorpe.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port carbon at 18.5% compared to 16.9% in Oglethorpe.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port carbon at 38.8% compared to 34.1% in Oglethorpe.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port carbon at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Oglethorpe.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port carbon Oglethorpe
No Schooling 0.5% (9) 0.6% (97)
High School Diploma 32.5% (587) 23.2% (3,583)
Less than High School 13.1% (237) 14.7% (2,268)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.0% (199) 15.4% (2,388)

Education Levels Comparison: Port carbon vs Oglethorpe

  • In Oglethorpe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Port carbon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port carbon hold a high school diploma at 32.5% compared to 23.2% in Oglethorpe.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oglethorpe at 14.7%, compared to 13.1% in Port carbon.
  • In Oglethorpe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 11.0% in Port carbon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.