Demographics details for Port arthur, TX vs Powder springs, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port arthur, TX vs Powder springs, GA.

Data Port arthur Powder springs
Population 55,579 17,337
Median Age 33.7 years 38.7 years
Median Income $45,357 $88,311
Married Families 30.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 23% 12%
Unemployment Rate 11.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Port arthur vs Powder springs

  • In Port arthur, the population is higher at 55,579, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
  • The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
  • Powder springs has a higher median income of $88,311, compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
  • In Powder springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port arthur.
  • Port arthur has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 12% in Powder springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Port arthur is higher at 11.0%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.

Demographics

Demographics Port arthur vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port arthur Powder springs
Black 43 51
White 3 22
Asian 6 2
Hispanic 34 19
Two or More Races 13 5
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Port arthur vs Powder springs

  • In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 43% in Port arthur.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Powder springs at 22% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port arthur at 6% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port arthur at 34% compared to 19% in Powder springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port arthur at 13% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port arthur and Powder springs at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port arthur Powder springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.5% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 15.9% 10.7%
Depression 20.4% 17.7%
Smoking 23.3% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 14.4%
Obesity 42.2% 33.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port arthur vs Powder springs

  • More residents in Port arthur report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port arthur at 20.4% compared to 17.7% in Powder springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port arthur at 23.3% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Powder springs at 14.4% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port arthur at 42.2% compared to 33.0% in Powder springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port arthur at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port arthur Powder springs
No Schooling 2.5% (1,383) 1.3% (225)
High School Diploma 19.6% (10,902) 15.0% (2,598)
Less than High School 23.7% (13,180) 7.6% (1,309)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.1% (3,955) 26.3% (4,561)

Education Levels Comparison: Port arthur vs Powder springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.3% in Powder springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port arthur hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
  • More residents in Port arthur have less than a high school education at 23.7% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
  • In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.