Demographics details for Pine lake, GA vs Sweetwater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pine lake, GA vs Sweetwater, TX.
| Data | Pine lake | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 732 | 10,408 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,359 | $44,306 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Pine lake vs Sweetwater
- The population in Sweetwater is higher at 10,408, compared to 732 in Pine lake.
- Residents in Pine lake have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 35.7 years in Sweetwater.
- Pine lake has a higher median income of $68,359 compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pine lake at 51.0% compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 10% in Pine lake.
- Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Pine lake.
Demographics
Demographics Pine lake vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pine lake | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 6 |
| White | 65 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pine lake vs Sweetwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pine lake at 23% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
- Pine lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 34% in Sweetwater.
- The Asian population is larger in Pine lake at 1% compared to 0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 2% in Pine lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sweetwater at 13%, compared to 9% in Pine lake.
- In Sweetwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pine lake.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pine lake | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 20.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pine lake vs Sweetwater
- More residents in Pine lake report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.1% in Sweetwater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sweetwater at 24.2% versus 24.1% in Pine lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pine lake at 21.7% compared to 20.3% in Sweetwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 13.3% in Pine lake.
- Sweetwater has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 35.8% in Pine lake.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 13.0% in Pine lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pine lake | Sweetwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.9% (194) |
| High School Diploma | 6.1% (45) | 16.0% (1,666) |
| Less than High School | 1.9% (14) | 23.1% (2,408) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.4% (398) | 7.0% (733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pine lake vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Pine lake.
- In Sweetwater, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 6.1% in Pine lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 1.9% in Pine lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pine lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.4% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.