Demographics details for Pikesville, MD vs Cochran, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pikesville, MD vs Cochran, GA.
| Data | Pikesville | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,101 | 4,647 |
| Median Age | 42.1 years | 28.9 years |
| Median Income | $94,408 | $31,326 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Pikesville vs Cochran
- In Pikesville, the population is higher at 34,101, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
- Residents in Pikesville have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
- Pikesville has a higher median income of $94,408 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pikesville at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
- The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 7% in Pikesville.
- The unemployment rate in Pikesville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.
Demographics
Demographics Pikesville vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pikesville | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 17 | 53 |
| White | 72 | 40 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pikesville vs Cochran
- In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 17% in Pikesville.
- Pikesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 40% in Cochran.
- The Asian population is larger in Pikesville at 4% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pikesville at 3% compared to 2% in Cochran.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pikesville at 4% compared to 3% in Cochran.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pikesville and Cochran at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pikesville | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.7% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 9.3% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.6% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pikesville vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.7% in Pikesville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cochran at 21.8% versus 21.2% in Pikesville.
- Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 9.3% in Pikesville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pikesville at 15.7% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
- Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 32.6% in Pikesville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Pikesville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pikesville | Cochran |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (285) | 1.2% (54) |
| High School Diploma | 7.8% (2,674) | 12.2% (569) |
| Less than High School | 5.2% (1,771) | 15.1% (703) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.1% (14,370) | 12.7% (592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pikesville vs Cochran
- In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Pikesville.
- In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 7.8% in Pikesville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 5.2% in Pikesville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pikesville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.1% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.