Demographics details for Pierson, MI vs Schenectady, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pierson, MI vs Schenectady, NY.
Data | Pierson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Population | 205 | 68,809 |
Median Age | 32.3 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $33,750 | $54,650 |
Married Families | 10.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Pierson vs Schenectady
- The population in Schenectady is higher at 68,809, compared to 205 in Pierson.
- The median age in Schenectady is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 32.3 years in Pierson.
- Schenectady has a higher median income of $54,650, compared to $33,750 in Pierson.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of married families is higher at 28.0%, compared to 10.0% in Pierson.
- The poverty level is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 10% in Pierson.
- Schenectady has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.5% in Pierson.
Demographics
Demographics Pierson vs Schenectady provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Pierson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 20 |
White | 100 | 47 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pierson vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Pierson.
- Pierson has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 47% in Schenectady.
- In Schenectady, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Pierson.
- Schenectady has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Pierson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Schenectady at 13%, compared to 0% in Pierson.
- In Schenectady, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Pierson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Pierson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 12.5% |
Depression | 25.9% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 19.8% | 22.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 35.8% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pierson vs Schenectady
- More residents in Pierson report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.4% in Schenectady.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pierson at 25.9% compared to 24.0% in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 19.8% in Pierson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pierson at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Schenectady.
- Schenectady has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 35.8% in Pierson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pierson at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Schenectady.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Pierson | Schenectady |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (3) | 1.7% (1,194) |
High School Diploma | 15.1% (31) | 15.3% (10,540) |
Less than High School | 16.6% (34) | 14.7% (10,146) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.0% (2) | 15.0% (10,303) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pierson vs Schenectady
- In Schenectady, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.5% in Pierson.
- In Schenectady, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 15.1% in Pierson.
- More residents in Pierson have less than a high school education at 16.6% compared to 14.7% in Schenectady.
- In Schenectady, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 1.0% in Pierson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.