Demographics details for Picayune, MS vs Harrison, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Picayune, MS vs Harrison, AR.
| Data | Picayune | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,826 | 13,338 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $35,649 | $39,677 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Picayune vs Harrison
- The population in Harrison is higher at 13,338, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- The median age in Harrison is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $39,677, compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Harrison, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 27.0% in Picayune.
- Picayune has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 15% in Harrison.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Picayune and Harrison at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Picayune vs Harrison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Picayune | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 38 | Data is updating |
| White | 55 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Picayune vs Harrison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Picayune at 38% compared to 0% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harrison at 92% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- Both Picayune and Harrison have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Harrison has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Picayune.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Picayune at 5% compared to 4% in Harrison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Picayune and Harrison at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Picayune | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 28.9% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 24.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 44.0% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Picayune vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.4% in Picayune.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harrison at 28.9% versus 24.0% in Picayune.
- Harrison has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 23.3% in Picayune.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harrison at 14.8% compared to 13.3% in Picayune.
- Obesity rates are higher in Picayune at 44.0% compared to 40.7% in Harrison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 18.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Picayune | Harrison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 0.9% (115) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (2,108) | 21.0% (2,807) |
| Less than High School | 11.8% (1,392) | 12.5% (1,665) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (1,200) | 13.1% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Picayune vs Harrison
- In Harrison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Picayune.
- In Harrison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 17.8% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harrison at 12.5%, compared to 11.8% in Picayune.
- In Harrison, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.1% compared to 10.1% in Picayune.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.