Environment details: Phil campbell AL
water quality is acceptable; monitor periodically.
Environment details: Ridgefield CT
Good water quality, meets health standards.
Compare Environment: Phil campbell AL vs Ridgefield CT
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Phil campbell | Ridgefield |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 867 | 293 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is acceptable; monitor periodically. | Good water quality, meets health standards. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.62 | 1.92 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 24 | 63 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Phil campbell vs Ridgefield
- The water quality in Ridgefield is superior at 7/10 compared to 5/10 in Phil campbell.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Ridgefield with an average index of 1.92 compared to 1.62 in Phil campbell.
- Ridgefield experiences more days with poor air quality at 63 compared to 24 in Phil campbell.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.