Demographics details for Pequot lakes, MN vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pequot lakes, MN vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Pequot lakes | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,440 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $73,125 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 2,440 in Pequot lakes.
- Residents in Pequot lakes have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $73,125 in Pequot lakes.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pequot lakes at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 9% in Pequot lakes.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Pequot lakes.
Demographics
Demographics Pequot lakes vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pequot lakes | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 94 | 2 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- Pequot lakes has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Pequot lakes.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 1% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 2% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pequot lakes and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pequot lakes | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 30.3% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 14.4% in Pequot lakes.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 23.3% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pequot lakes at 15.2% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pequot lakes at 19.4% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 30.3% in Pequot lakes.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pequot lakes at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pequot lakes | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (17) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 14.0% (341) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (84) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.7% (504) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pequot lakes vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.7% in Pequot lakes.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 14.0% in Pequot lakes.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 3.4% in Pequot lakes.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pequot lakes hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.