Demographics details for Pella, IA vs Bridgeport, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pella, IA vs Bridgeport, CT.
| Data | Pella | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,744 | 148,377 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $86,025 | $54,440 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Pella vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 10,744 in Pella.
- The median age in Bridgeport is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 35.5 years in Pella.
- Pella has a higher median income of $86,025 compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Pella at 44.0% compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 12%, compared to 7% in Pella.
- Bridgeport has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 2.5% in Pella.
Demographics
Demographics Pella vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pella | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 22 |
| White | 93 | 26 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pella vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Pella.
- Pella has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Pella.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bridgeport at 9%, compared to 2% in Pella.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pella and Bridgeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pella | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.6% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.4% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pella vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 14.4% in Pella.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pella at 18.6% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 14.6% in Pella.
- Binge drinking is more common in Pella at 22.4% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pella at 35.5% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bridgeport at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Pella.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pella | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (22) | 2.5% (3,659) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,433) | 18.7% (27,806) |
| Less than High School | 6.0% (646) | 23.9% (35,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.3% (3,036) | 16.8% (24,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pella vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.2% in Pella.
- In Bridgeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 13.3% in Pella.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 6.0% in Pella.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pella hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 16.8% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.