Demographics details for Peachtree city, GA vs Tuscaloosa, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Peachtree city, GA vs Tuscaloosa, AL.

Data Peachtree city Tuscaloosa
Population 39,562 110,602
Median Age 44.2 years 28.8 years
Median Income $111,850 $47,257
Married Families 49.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 6% 21%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Peachtree city vs Tuscaloosa

  • The population in Tuscaloosa is higher at 110,602, compared to 39,562 in Peachtree city.
  • Residents in Peachtree city have a higher median age of 44.2 years compared to 28.8 years in Tuscaloosa.
  • Peachtree city has a higher median income of $111,850 compared to $47,257 in Tuscaloosa.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Peachtree city at 49.0% compared to 26.0% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tuscaloosa at 21%, compared to 6% in Peachtree city.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Peachtree city.

Demographics

Demographics Peachtree city vs Tuscaloosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Peachtree city Tuscaloosa
Black 9 41
White 69 49
Asian 8 3
Hispanic 8 4
Two or More Races 6 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Peachtree city vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 9% in Peachtree city.
  • Peachtree city has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 49% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The Asian population is larger in Peachtree city at 8% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Peachtree city at 8% compared to 4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Peachtree city at 6% compared to 3% in Tuscaloosa.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Peachtree city and Tuscaloosa at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Peachtree city Tuscaloosa
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 19.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.3% 13.6%
Depression 19.8% 21.9%
Smoking 10.0% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 14.4%
Obesity 26.5% 44.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Peachtree city vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 13.2% in Peachtree city.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tuscaloosa at 21.9% versus 19.8% in Peachtree city.
  • Tuscaloosa has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 10.0% in Peachtree city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Peachtree city at 17.5% compared to 14.4% in Tuscaloosa.
  • Tuscaloosa has higher obesity rates at 44.5% compared to 26.5% in Peachtree city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Peachtree city at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Tuscaloosa.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Peachtree city Tuscaloosa
No Schooling 0.2% (80) 0.7% (721)
High School Diploma 9.0% (3,554) 12.5% (13,878)
Less than High School 2.6% (1,023) 6.1% (6,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.6% (15,684) 20.3% (22,425)

Education Levels Comparison: Peachtree city vs Tuscaloosa

  • In Tuscaloosa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Peachtree city.
  • In Tuscaloosa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 9.0% in Peachtree city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tuscaloosa at 6.1%, compared to 2.6% in Peachtree city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Peachtree city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 20.3% in Tuscaloosa.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.