Demographics details for Paw paw, MI vs Niles, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paw paw, MI vs Niles, OH.
Data | Paw paw | Niles |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,395 | 18,286 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $46,516 | $48,860 |
Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Paw paw vs Niles
- The population in Niles is higher at 18,286, compared to 3,395 in Paw paw.
- The median age in Niles is higher at 44.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Paw paw.
- Niles has a higher median income of $48,860, compared to $46,516 in Paw paw.
- In Niles, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Paw paw.
- The poverty level is higher in Niles at 12%, compared to 10% in Paw paw.
- Niles has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Paw paw.
Demographics
Demographics Paw paw vs Niles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Paw paw | Niles |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 75 | 89 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paw paw vs Niles
- In Niles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Paw paw.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Niles at 89% compared to 75% in Paw paw.
- Both Paw paw and Niles have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Paw paw at 12% compared to 2% in Niles.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Paw paw at 10% compared to 4% in Niles.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paw paw and Niles at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Paw paw | Niles |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 13.2% |
Depression | 26.2% | 25.6% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 23.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paw paw vs Niles
- In Niles, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.1% in Paw paw.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paw paw at 26.2% compared to 25.6% in Niles.
- Niles has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 20.2% in Paw paw.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paw paw at 18.4% compared to 16.4% in Niles.
- Niles has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 37.1% in Paw paw.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Niles at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Paw paw.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Paw paw | Niles |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (47) | 0.6% (107) |
High School Diploma | 20.0% (679) | 29.6% (5,406) |
Less than High School | 10.7% (364) | 14.4% (2,630) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (259) | 15.7% (2,876) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paw paw vs Niles
- A higher percentage of residents in Paw paw have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Niles.
- In Niles, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.6% compared to 20.0% in Paw paw.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Niles at 14.4%, compared to 10.7% in Paw paw.
- In Niles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 7.6% in Paw paw.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.