Demographics details for Paw paw, IL vs Paramount, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paw paw, IL vs Paramount, CA.
| Data | Paw paw | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 816 | 51,653 |
| Median Age | 35.5 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,571 | $67,197 |
| Married Families | 57.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Paw paw vs Paramount
- The population in Paramount is higher at 51,653, compared to 816 in Paw paw.
- Residents in Paw paw have a higher median age of 35.5 years compared to 31.9 years in Paramount.
- Paramount has a higher median income of $67,197, compared to $58,571 in Paw paw.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paw paw at 57.0% compared to 32.0% in Paramount.
- The poverty level is higher in Paramount at 15%, compared to 9% in Paw paw.
- Paramount has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 4.2% in Paw paw.
Demographics
Demographics Paw paw vs Paramount provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paw paw | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 98 | -20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Paw paw vs Paramount
- In Paramount, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Paw paw.
- Paw paw has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to -20% in Paramount.
- In Paramount, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Paw paw.
- Paramount has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 1% in Paw paw.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paramount at 21%, compared to 1% in Paw paw.
- In Paramount, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Paw paw.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paw paw | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 13.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 34.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paw paw vs Paramount
- In Paramount, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Paw paw.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paw paw at 22.2% compared to 16.2% in Paramount.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paw paw at 17.9% compared to 13.3% in Paramount.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paw paw at 18.5% compared to 14.2% in Paramount.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paw paw at 36.1% compared to 34.2% in Paramount.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paw paw at 18.0% compared to 8.0% in Paramount.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paw paw | Paramount |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 5.0% (2,572) |
| High School Diploma | 26.2% (214) | 16.3% (8,418) |
| Less than High School | 9.3% (76) | 42.4% (21,924) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.4% (85) | 8.3% (4,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paw paw vs Paramount
- In Paramount, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in Paw paw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paw paw hold a high school diploma at 26.2% compared to 16.3% in Paramount.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paramount at 42.4%, compared to 9.3% in Paw paw.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paw paw hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.4% compared to 8.3% in Paramount.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.