Demographics details for Paulding, OH vs Bridgeport, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paulding, OH vs Bridgeport, CT.
| Data | Paulding | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,757 | 148,377 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $65,331 | $54,440 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Paulding vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 18,757 in Paulding.
- Residents in Paulding have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Paulding has a higher median income of $65,331 compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paulding at 44.0% compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Bridgeport at 12%, compared to 10% in Paulding.
- The unemployment rate in Paulding is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Paulding vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paulding | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 22 |
| White | 89 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Paulding vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 1% in Paulding.
- Paulding has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Paulding.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 5% in Paulding.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bridgeport at 9%, compared to 5% in Paulding.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paulding and Bridgeport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paulding | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paulding vs Bridgeport
- More residents in Paulding report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Paulding at 23.9% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paulding at 21.8% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paulding at 18.2% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paulding at 43.7% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paulding at 17.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paulding | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (100) | 2.5% (3,659) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (5,271) | 18.7% (27,806) |
| Less than High School | 13.6% (2,557) | 23.9% (35,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.7% (2,004) | 16.8% (24,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paulding vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.5% in Paulding.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paulding hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 18.7% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 13.6% in Paulding.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 10.7% in Paulding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.