Demographics details for Parker, SD vs Pembroke pines, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Parker, SD vs Pembroke pines, FL.
Data | Parker | Pembroke pines |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,221 | 169,876 |
Median Age | 39.3 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $83,864 | $77,657 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Parker vs Pembroke pines
- The population in Pembroke pines is higher at 169,876, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- The median age in Pembroke pines is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 39.3 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864 compared to $77,657 in Pembroke pines.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Parker and Pembroke pines at 39.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Pembroke pines at 10%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- Pembroke pines has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Parker vs Pembroke pines provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Parker | Pembroke pines |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 21 |
White | 85 | 9 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 47 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Parker vs Pembroke pines
- In Pembroke pines, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 4% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 9% in Pembroke pines.
- In Pembroke pines, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Parker.
- Pembroke pines has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 5% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pembroke pines at 18%, compared to 4% in Parker.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Parker at 2% compared to 0% in Pembroke pines.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Parker | Pembroke pines |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.5% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 9.7% |
Depression | 17.8% | 16.0% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 13.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.4% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 34.4% | 28.3% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Parker vs Pembroke pines
- In Pembroke pines, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.4% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Parker at 17.8% compared to 16.0% in Pembroke pines.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Parker at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Pembroke pines.
- Binge drinking is more common in Parker at 20.4% compared to 14.8% in Pembroke pines.
- Obesity rates are higher in Parker at 34.4% compared to 28.3% in Pembroke pines.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pembroke pines at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Parker | Pembroke pines |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.3% (2,184) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (218) | 18.7% (31,781) |
Less than High School | 13.0% (159) | 8.3% (14,103) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.9% (158) | 25.9% (43,973) |
Education Levels Comparison: Parker vs Pembroke pines
- In Pembroke pines, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Pembroke pines, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- More residents in Parker have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 8.3% in Pembroke pines.
- In Pembroke pines, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.9% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.