Demographics details for Park rapids, MN vs Riverbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Park rapids, MN vs Riverbank, CA.
| Data | Park rapids | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,269 | 24,826 |
| Median Age | 43.1 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $42,892 | $89,504 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Park rapids vs Riverbank
- The population in Riverbank is higher at 24,826, compared to 4,269 in Park rapids.
- Residents in Park rapids have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504, compared to $42,892 in Park rapids.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 28.0% in Park rapids.
- The poverty level is identical in both Park rapids and Riverbank at 10%.
- Riverbank has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Park rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Park rapids vs Riverbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Park rapids | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 86 | 13 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 23 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Park rapids vs Riverbank
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Park rapids and Riverbank at 1%.
- Park rapids has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- In Riverbank, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Park rapids.
- Riverbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 6% in Park rapids.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverbank at 23%, compared to 5% in Park rapids.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Park rapids and Riverbank at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Park rapids | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.2% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 23.7% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Park rapids vs Riverbank
- More residents in Park rapids report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
- Depression is more prevalent in Park rapids at 25.2% compared to 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Park rapids at 23.7% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- Binge drinking is more common in Park rapids at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Park rapids at 40.2% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Park rapids at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Park rapids | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (13) | 3.1% (766) |
| High School Diploma | 15.3% (654) | 15.2% (3,764) |
| Less than High School | 12.6% (537) | 22.2% (5,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (652) | 11.3% (2,804) |
Education Levels Comparison: Park rapids vs Riverbank
- In Riverbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.3% in Park rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park rapids hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverbank at 22.2%, compared to 12.6% in Park rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Park rapids hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.