Demographics details for Paris, KY vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paris, KY vs Central point, OR.
| Data | Paris | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,075 | 19,222 |
| Median Age | 36.6 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $46,752 | $79,731 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Paris vs Central point
- The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 10,075 in Paris.
- The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.6 years in Paris.
- Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $46,752 in Paris.
- In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Paris.
- Paris has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Central point.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Paris.
Demographics
Demographics Paris vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paris | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Paris vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Paris at 8% compared to 0% in Central point.
- Paris has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 76% in Central point.
- In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Paris.
- Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 5% in Paris.
- Both Paris and Central point have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Paris and Central point at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paris | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.9% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paris vs Central point
- More residents in Paris report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 27.5% in Paris.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Paris at 23.5% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Paris.
- Obesity rates are higher in Paris at 38.8% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are higher in Paris at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paris | Central point |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.2% (424) | 1.7% (319) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (1,790) | 16.1% (3,095) |
| Less than High School | 20.9% (2,105) | 13.2% (2,530) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (1,365) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paris vs Central point
- A higher percentage of residents in Paris have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paris hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
- More residents in Paris have less than a high school education at 20.9% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
- In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 13.5% in Paris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.