Demographics details for Paramus, NJ vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Paramus, NJ vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Paramus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,359 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 49.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $136,824 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Paramus vs Coalinga
- In Paramus, the population is higher at 26,359, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Paramus have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Paramus has a higher median income of $136,824 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Paramus at 47.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 4% in Paramus.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.3% in Paramus.
Demographics
Demographics Paramus vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Paramus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 50 | 9 |
| Asian | 24 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Paramus vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Paramus.
- Paramus has a higher percentage of White residents at 50% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Paramus at 24% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 14% in Paramus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 8% in Paramus.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Paramus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Paramus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 16.1% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 10.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 22.8% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Paramus vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Paramus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coalinga at 16.4% versus 16.1% in Paramus.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 10.9% in Paramus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Paramus at 17.0% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 22.8% in Paramus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Paramus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Paramus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (194) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,006) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 6.7% (1,764) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 37.1% (9,785) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Paramus vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.7% in Paramus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramus hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 6.7% in Paramus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Paramus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.1% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.