Demographics details for Pana, IL vs Indian trail, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pana, IL vs Indian trail, NC.
| Data | Pana | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,093 | 41,724 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 36.1 years |
| Median Income | $47,763 | $95,101 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Pana vs Indian trail
- The population in Indian trail is higher at 41,724, compared to 5,093 in Pana.
- Residents in Pana have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 36.1 years in Indian trail.
- Indian trail has a higher median income of $95,101, compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- In Indian trail, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- Pana has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Indian trail.
- The unemployment rate in Pana is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.8% in Indian trail.
Demographics
Demographics Pana vs Indian trail provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pana | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 9 |
| White | 93 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pana vs Indian trail
- In Indian trail, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Pana.
- Pana has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 71% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Pana.
- Indian trail has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Indian trail at 6%, compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pana and Indian trail at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pana | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.9% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 21.3% | 13.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 39.1% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pana vs Indian trail
- More residents in Pana report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.6% in Indian trail.
- Depression is more prevalent in Pana at 22.8% compared to 22.0% in Indian trail.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pana at 21.3% compared to 13.5% in Indian trail.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indian trail at 18.5% compared to 17.5% in Pana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pana at 39.1% compared to 31.2% in Indian trail.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pana at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Indian trail.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pana | Indian trail |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (21) | 0.7% (287) |
| High School Diploma | 30.7% (1,563) | 12.8% (5,353) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (870) | 6.6% (2,761) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.0% (559) | 24.4% (10,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pana vs Indian trail
- In Indian trail, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Pana.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pana hold a high school diploma at 30.7% compared to 12.8% in Indian trail.
- More residents in Pana have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 6.6% in Indian trail.
- In Indian trail, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 11.0% in Pana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.