Demographics details for Pahrump, NV vs Sterling heights, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Pahrump, NV vs Sterling heights, MI.
| Data | Pahrump | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,711 | 132,567 |
| Median Age | 53.7 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $54,988 | $75,381 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Pahrump vs Sterling heights
- The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 44,711 in Pahrump.
- Residents in Pahrump have a higher median age of 53.7 years compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $54,988 in Pahrump.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Pahrump and Sterling heights at 45.0%.
- Pahrump has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
- The unemployment rate in Pahrump is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.
Demographics
Demographics Pahrump vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Pahrump | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 69 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Pahrump vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Pahrump.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 69% in Pahrump.
- In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Pahrump.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Pahrump at 16% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Pahrump at 10% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Pahrump at 1% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Pahrump | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Pahrump vs Sterling heights
- More residents in Pahrump report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 24.4% in Pahrump.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.9% in Pahrump.
- Obesity rates are higher in Pahrump at 38.5% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Pahrump at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Pahrump | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (507) | 2.4% (3,134) |
| High School Diploma | 23.0% (10,287) | 18.8% (24,937) |
| Less than High School | 20.5% (9,157) | 16.6% (22,008) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (4,495) | 22.3% (29,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Pahrump vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.1% in Pahrump.
- A higher percentage of residents in Pahrump hold a high school diploma at 23.0% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents in Pahrump have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
- In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 10.1% in Pahrump.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.