Demographics details for Pachuta, MS vs Roseville, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Pachuta, MS vs Roseville, MI.

Data Pachuta Roseville
Population 199 46,812
Median Age 53.0 years 40.7 years
Median Income $31,964 $57,274
Married Families 36.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 21% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 6.3

Population Comparison: Pachuta vs Roseville

  • The population in Roseville is higher at 46,812, compared to 199 in Pachuta.
  • Residents in Pachuta have a higher median age of 53.0 years compared to 40.7 years in Roseville.
  • Roseville has a higher median income of $57,274, compared to $31,964 in Pachuta.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Roseville.
  • Pachuta has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Roseville.
  • Roseville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 5.0% in Pachuta.

Demographics

Demographics Pachuta vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Pachuta Roseville
Black 39 23
White 55 67
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Pachuta vs Roseville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Pachuta at 39% compared to 23% in Roseville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Roseville at 67% compared to 55% in Pachuta.
  • In Roseville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Pachuta.
  • Roseville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Pachuta.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Pachuta at 6% compared to 5% in Roseville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Pachuta and Roseville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Pachuta Roseville
Mental Health Not Good 19.9% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.4% 13.2%
Depression 24.7% 26.9%
Smoking 25.8% 23.6%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 17.4%
Obesity 47.3% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 36.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Pachuta vs Roseville

  • More residents in Pachuta report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 19.7% in Roseville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Roseville at 26.9% versus 24.7% in Pachuta.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Pachuta at 25.8% compared to 23.6% in Roseville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 17.4% compared to 12.9% in Pachuta.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Pachuta at 47.3% compared to 40.3% in Roseville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Pachuta at 36.0% compared to 19.0% in Roseville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Pachuta Roseville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.2% (563)
High School Diploma 16.1% (32) 21.9% (10,268)
Less than High School 24.6% (49) 14.8% (6,925)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.0% (16) 10.3% (4,839)

Education Levels Comparison: Pachuta vs Roseville

  • In Roseville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Pachuta.
  • In Roseville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 16.1% in Pachuta.
  • More residents in Pachuta have less than a high school education at 24.6% compared to 14.8% in Roseville.
  • In Roseville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 8.0% in Pachuta.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.