Demographics details for Ozark, IL vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ozark, IL vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Ozark | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 394 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 48.0 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $69,000 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Ozark vs Whitehall
- The population in Whitehall is higher at 1,632, compared to 394 in Ozark.
- Residents in Ozark have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Ozark has a higher median income of $69,000 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ozark at 46.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Ozark has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- The unemployment rate in Ozark is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.6% in Whitehall.
Demographics
Demographics Ozark vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Ozark | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 79 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ozark vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Ozark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 83% compared to 79% in Ozark.
- Both Ozark and Whitehall have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ozark at 18% compared to 12% in Whitehall.
- Both Ozark and Whitehall have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ozark.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Ozark | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.3% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ozark vs Whitehall
- In Whitehall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Ozark.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 0.0% in Ozark.
- Whitehall has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Ozark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Ozark.
- Whitehall has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in Ozark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Whitehall at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Ozark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Ozark | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (11) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 21.8% (86) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 16.8% (66) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (38) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ozark vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 21.8% in Ozark.
- More residents in Ozark have less than a high school education at 16.8% compared to 15.7% in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ozark hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.