Demographics details for Overgaard, AZ vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Overgaard, AZ vs Stillwater, OK.
Data | Overgaard | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,651 | 49,160 |
Median Age | 55.8 years | 23.4 years |
Median Income | $39,779 | $39,998 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Overgaard vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 2,651 in Overgaard.
- Residents in Overgaard have a higher median age of 55.8 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $39,998, compared to $39,779 in Overgaard.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Overgaard at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 12% in Overgaard.
- The unemployment rate in Overgaard is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Overgaard vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Overgaard | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 87 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
American Indian | 3 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Overgaard vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Overgaard.
- Overgaard has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Overgaard.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Overgaard and Stillwater at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 5% in Overgaard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Overgaard and Stillwater at 3%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Overgaard | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.2% |
Depression | 20.4% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Overgaard vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.9% in Overgaard.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 20.4% in Overgaard.
- Stillwater has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 14.6% in Overgaard.
- Binge drinking is more common in Overgaard at 18.1% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 32.9% in Overgaard.
- Disability percentages are higher in Overgaard at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Overgaard | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (239) |
High School Diploma | 20.9% (554) | 6.5% (3,199) |
Less than High School | 19.3% (512) | 3.9% (1,910) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (248) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Overgaard vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Overgaard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Overgaard hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Overgaard have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 9.4% in Overgaard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.