Demographics details for Overgaard, AZ vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Overgaard, AZ vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Overgaard | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,651 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 55.8 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $39,779 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Overgaard vs Chino hills
- The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 2,651 in Overgaard.
- Residents in Overgaard have a higher median age of 55.8 years compared to 39.4 years in Chino hills.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $39,779 in Overgaard.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 39.0% in Overgaard.
- Overgaard has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- The unemployment rate in Overgaard is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.
Demographics
Demographics Overgaard vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Overgaard | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 87 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 40 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Overgaard vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Overgaard.
- Overgaard has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 0% in Overgaard.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Overgaard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 5% in Overgaard.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Overgaard at 3% compared to 0% in Chino hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Overgaard | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 20.4% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Overgaard vs Chino hills
- More residents in Overgaard report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Overgaard at 20.4% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Overgaard at 14.6% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Overgaard at 18.1% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Overgaard at 32.9% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Overgaard at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Overgaard | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 20.9% (554) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (512) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (248) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Overgaard vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Overgaard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Overgaard hold a high school diploma at 20.9% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- More residents in Overgaard have less than a high school education at 19.3% compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 9.4% in Overgaard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.