Demographics details for Oklahoma city, OK vs South jordan, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Oklahoma city, OK vs South jordan, UT.

Data Oklahoma city South jordan
Population 694,800 83,513
Median Age 34.9 years 34.4 years
Median Income $64,251 $119,822
Married Families 36.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 13% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Oklahoma city vs South jordan

  • In Oklahoma city, the population is higher at 694,800, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
  • Residents in Oklahoma city have a higher median age of 34.9 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $64,251 in Oklahoma city.
  • In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 36.0% in Oklahoma city.
  • Oklahoma city has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Oklahoma city.

Demographics

Demographics Oklahoma city vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Oklahoma city South jordan
Black 13 Data is updating
White 48 83
Asian 4 4
Hispanic 20 7
Two or More Races 12 5
American Indian 3 1

Demographics Comparison: Oklahoma city vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oklahoma city at 13% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 48% in Oklahoma city.
  • Both Oklahoma city and South jordan have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Oklahoma city at 20% compared to 7% in South jordan.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Oklahoma city at 12% compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Oklahoma city at 3% compared to 1% in South jordan.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Oklahoma city South jordan
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 16.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.3% 9.0%
Depression 24.8% 26.5%
Smoking 18.2% 7.3%
Binge Drinking 13.1% 16.9%
Obesity 38.0% 28.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Oklahoma city vs South jordan

  • More residents in Oklahoma city report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 24.8% in Oklahoma city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Oklahoma city at 18.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 13.1% in Oklahoma city.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Oklahoma city at 38.0% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Oklahoma city at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Oklahoma city South jordan
No Schooling 1.3% (9,023) 0.2% (172)
High School Diploma 13.0% (90,670) 8.4% (6,995)
Less than High School 14.0% (97,428) 2.7% (2,236)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (148,128) 27.1% (22,648)

Education Levels Comparison: Oklahoma city vs South jordan

  • A higher percentage of residents in Oklahoma city have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oklahoma city hold a high school diploma at 13.0% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • More residents in Oklahoma city have less than a high school education at 14.0% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 21.3% in Oklahoma city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.