Demographics details for Oakridge, OR vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Oakridge, OR vs Fort thomas, KY.
| Data | Oakridge | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,175 | 17,133 |
| Median Age | 48.2 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $29,336 | $95,391 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Oakridge vs Fort thomas
- The population in Fort thomas is higher at 17,133, compared to 3,175 in Oakridge.
- Residents in Oakridge have a higher median age of 48.2 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $29,336 in Oakridge.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 33.0% in Oakridge.
- Oakridge has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate in Oakridge is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.0% in Fort thomas.
Demographics
Demographics Oakridge vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Oakridge | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 94 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Oakridge vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Oakridge.
- Oakridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 92% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Oakridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Oakridge at 3% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort thomas at 4%, compared to 3% in Oakridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Oakridge and Fort thomas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Oakridge | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.5% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 31.6% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 22.5% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Oakridge vs Fort thomas
- More residents in Oakridge report poor mental health at 22.7% compared to 15.5% in Fort thomas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Oakridge at 31.6% compared to 26.2% in Fort thomas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Oakridge at 22.5% compared to 13.6% in Fort thomas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort thomas at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Oakridge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Oakridge at 39.3% compared to 32.4% in Fort thomas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Oakridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Oakridge | Fort thomas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (102) | 0.4% (66) |
| High School Diploma | 27.6% (875) | 10.7% (1,840) |
| Less than High School | 30.7% (974) | 3.3% (569) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (320) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Oakridge vs Fort thomas
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakridge have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.4% in Fort thomas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Oakridge hold a high school diploma at 27.6% compared to 10.7% in Fort thomas.
- More residents in Oakridge have less than a high school education at 30.7% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 10.1% in Oakridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.