Demographics details for Oakland park, FL vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Oakland park, FL vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Oakland park Grand junction
Population 43,824 68,034
Median Age 39.1 years 39.9 years
Median Income $64,989 $62,993
Married Families 30.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.7

Population Comparison: Oakland park vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 43,824 in Oakland park.
  • The median age in Grand junction is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.

Demographics

Demographics Oakland park vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Oakland park Grand junction
Black 29 1
White 20 73
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 32 16
Two or More Races 17 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Oakland park vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Oakland park at 29% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Oakland park at 2% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Oakland park at 32% compared to 16% in Grand junction.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Oakland park at 17% compared to 8% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Oakland park.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Oakland park Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.2% 11.8%
Depression 17.8% 24.5%
Smoking 20.1% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 19.2%
Obesity 31.1% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Oakland park vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 17.8% in Oakland park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Oakland park at 20.1% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Oakland park at 31.1% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Oakland park Grand junction
No Schooling 1.4% (596) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 19.8% (8,695) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 16.2% (7,092) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.7% (9,073) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Oakland park vs Grand junction

  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Oakland park hold a high school diploma at 19.8% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • More residents in Oakland park have less than a high school education at 16.2% compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 20.7% in Oakland park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.