Demographics details for Norwood, NY vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norwood, NY vs Washington, IN.
| Data | Norwood | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,554 | 12,171 |
| Median Age | 52.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $48,255 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Norwood vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 12,171, compared to 1,554 in Norwood.
- Residents in Norwood have a higher median age of 52.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Norwood has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $48,255 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Norwood.
- The poverty level is identical in both Norwood and Washington at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Norwood is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.2% in Washington.
Demographics
Demographics Norwood vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norwood | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 97 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norwood vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Norwood.
- Norwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 76% in Washington.
- Both Norwood and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 1% in Norwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 1% in Norwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Norwood at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norwood | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 18.8% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 36.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norwood vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in Norwood.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 27.6% versus 24.0% in Norwood.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 18.8% in Norwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norwood at 21.1% compared to 16.3% in Washington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norwood at 37.2% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norwood at 25.0% compared to 16.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norwood | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (42) | 1.3% (163) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (273) | 22.8% (2,771) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (210) | 20.2% (2,460) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.9% (247) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norwood vs Washington
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwood have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 17.6% in Norwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 20.2%, compared to 13.5% in Norwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.