Demographics details for Norway, ME vs Milledgeville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norway, ME vs Milledgeville, GA.
| Data | Norway | Milledgeville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,698 | 16,837 |
| Median Age | 45.8 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $38,381 | $40,672 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Norway vs Milledgeville
- The population in Milledgeville is higher at 16,837, compared to 2,698 in Norway.
- Residents in Norway have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 26.5 years in Milledgeville.
- Milledgeville has a higher median income of $40,672, compared to $38,381 in Norway.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Norway at 31.0% compared to 20.0% in Milledgeville.
- The poverty level is higher in Milledgeville at 24%, compared to 12% in Norway.
- Milledgeville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Norway.
Demographics
Demographics Norway vs Milledgeville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norway | Milledgeville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 45 |
| White | 85 | 47 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Norway vs Milledgeville
- In Milledgeville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 45% compared to 1% in Norway.
- Norway has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 47% in Milledgeville.
- In Milledgeville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Norway.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Norway and Milledgeville at 3%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norway at 11% compared to 2% in Milledgeville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norway and Milledgeville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norway | Milledgeville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 21.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norway vs Milledgeville
- More residents in Norway report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 18.3% in Milledgeville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norway at 27.7% compared to 20.6% in Milledgeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norway at 21.7% compared to 21.1% in Milledgeville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Norway at 17.1% compared to 14.2% in Milledgeville.
- Milledgeville has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 35.4% in Norway.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norway at 28.0% compared to 13.0% in Milledgeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norway | Milledgeville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.7% (153) | 0.8% (139) |
| High School Diploma | 30.9% (835) | 11.0% (1,844) |
| Less than High School | 21.3% (574) | 12.1% (2,041) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.2% (356) | 13.3% (2,237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norway vs Milledgeville
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway have no formal schooling at 5.7% compared to 0.8% in Milledgeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norway hold a high school diploma at 30.9% compared to 11.0% in Milledgeville.
- More residents in Norway have less than a high school education at 21.3% compared to 12.1% in Milledgeville.
- In Milledgeville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 13.2% in Norway.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.