Demographics details for Norwalk, CT vs Moorpark, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norwalk, CT vs Moorpark, CA.
| Data | Norwalk | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,401 | 35,514 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $97,879 | $143,218 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Norwalk vs Moorpark
- In Norwalk, the population is higher at 91,401, compared to 35,514 in Moorpark.
- Residents in Norwalk have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 38.8 years in Moorpark.
- Moorpark has a higher median income of $143,218, compared to $97,879 in Norwalk.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 40.0% in Norwalk.
- The poverty level is identical in both Norwalk and Moorpark at 8%.
- Moorpark has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.6% in Norwalk.
Demographics
Demographics Norwalk vs Moorpark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norwalk | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 3 |
| White | 35 | 38 |
| Asian | 4 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Norwalk vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norwalk at 18% compared to 3% in Moorpark.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Moorpark at 38% compared to 35% in Norwalk.
- In Moorpark, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 4% in Norwalk.
- Moorpark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 31% in Norwalk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moorpark at 17%, compared to 12% in Norwalk.
- In Moorpark, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Norwalk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norwalk | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 17.8% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 12.2% | 9.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 24.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norwalk vs Moorpark
- More residents in Norwalk report poor mental health at 14.0% compared to 13.8% in Moorpark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Norwalk at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Moorpark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Norwalk at 12.2% compared to 9.2% in Moorpark.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Moorpark at 17.8% compared to 16.3% in Norwalk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Norwalk at 25.9% compared to 24.7% in Moorpark.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Moorpark at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Norwalk.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norwalk | Moorpark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (1,895) | 0.8% (300) |
| High School Diploma | 13.8% (12,648) | 9.3% (3,304) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (13,786) | 11.8% (4,201) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.8% (28,160) | 30.1% (10,699) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norwalk vs Moorpark
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk hold a high school diploma at 13.8% compared to 9.3% in Moorpark.
- More residents in Norwalk have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 11.8% in Moorpark.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norwalk hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.8% compared to 30.1% in Moorpark.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.