Demographics details for North fork, CA vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in North fork, CA vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | North fork | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,943 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 53.1 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $70,988 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: North fork vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 11,943 in North fork.
- Residents in North fork have a higher median age of 53.1 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- North fork has a higher median income of $70,988 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in North fork at 42.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 10% in North fork.
- The unemployment rate in North fork is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics North fork vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | North fork | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 73 |
| White | 75 | 12 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: North fork vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 0% in North fork.
- North fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The Asian population is larger in North fork at 1% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both North fork and Fairburn at 12%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in North fork at 10% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in North fork at 2% compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | North fork | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: North fork vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in North fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairburn at 16.8% versus 0.0% in North fork.
- Fairburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in North fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in North fork.
- Fairburn has higher obesity rates at 33.7% compared to 0.0% in North fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in North fork at 21.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | North fork | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (157) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (1,731) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 14.1% (1,688) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (2,619) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: North fork vs Fairburn
- A higher percentage of residents in North fork have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in North fork hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in North fork have less than a high school education at 14.1% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in North fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.