Demographics details for Norristown, PA vs Carthage, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Norristown, PA vs Carthage, MO.
| Data | Norristown | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 35,795 | 15,491 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 31.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,068 | $43,526 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Norristown vs Carthage
- In Norristown, the population is higher at 35,795, compared to 15,491 in Carthage.
- Residents in Norristown have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
- Norristown has a higher median income of $59,068 compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
- In Carthage, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 26.0% in Norristown.
- The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 14%, compared to 10% in Norristown.
- Carthage has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.3% in Norristown.
Demographics
Demographics Norristown vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Norristown | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 33 | 2 |
| White | 19 | 52 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Norristown vs Carthage
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Norristown at 33% compared to 2% in Carthage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carthage at 52% compared to 19% in Norristown.
- The Asian population is larger in Norristown at 3% compared to 1% in Carthage.
- Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 27% in Norristown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Norristown at 16% compared to 10% in Carthage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Norristown and Carthage at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Norristown | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 21.4% | 24.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 40.8% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Norristown vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.1% in Norristown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 26.7% versus 20.3% in Norristown.
- Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 21.4% in Norristown.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carthage at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Norristown.
- Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 40.8% in Norristown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Norristown at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Carthage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Norristown | Carthage |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (479) | 3.7% (576) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (7,193) | 13.1% (2,032) |
| Less than High School | 15.9% (5,695) | 30.4% (4,717) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (5,148) | 12.9% (2,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: Norristown vs Carthage
- In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 1.3% in Norristown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norristown hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 30.4%, compared to 15.9% in Norristown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Norristown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.9% in Carthage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.